|
By David
Fisher
Staff
Reporter |
Test results from a court ordered inspection of Westview
High School and Martin Middle School by an independent,
neutral firm, to check for mold and moisture problems, has
resulted in additional legal action on the part of the
plaintiffs involved in a lawsuit alleging mold problems at
the schools.
Plaintiff’s Argument
On Wednesday, February 4, attorneys Larry E. Parrish and
Amber Griffin, representing Carol Hinman and her minor
children – Griffin Pochop, Dominique Pochop and Paige Pochop,
filed the third amended complaint against the Weakley County
School Board alleging common law negligence, public nuisance
and fraud. The plaintiffs also seek compensatory and
punitive damages, recovery of costs and attorneys fees.
Parrish provided the Dresden Enterprise with copy of the
amended lawsuit and a news release explaining the intent of
the lawsuit.
According to the release, on January 16, 2009, plaintiffs
filed the Mold Remediation Inspection Report for Westview
High School and Martin Middle School. This report was
written as the result an inspection ordered by the Circuit
Court for the 27th Judicial District of Tennessee. The
inspection for the presence of water intrusion and visible
mold growth was conducted after the completion of the
remediation provided by the Weakley County Board of
Education, in response to the lawsuit filed against them
alleging negligence due to the presence of harmful mold
within Westview High School walls.
As agreed by both parties, in accordance with the court
order issued June 3, 2008, the inspection was conducted by
EHS Services, LLC, of Hendersonville, Tennessee, which is a
neutral third party.
Parrish states the report shows active water intrusion in
areas such as the theater, with saturated and warped
flooring and water running down the wall when there is a
heavy rain. The library also had evidence of damage, and the
inspector reports that the suspended ceiling shows signs of
water intrusion throughout the school.
Parrish argues that visible mold growth was present in areas
associated with the water intrusion problems identified,
including potential mold growth under the wood flooring in
the theater, growth under some bookshelves in the library,
growth on items in different areas of inspected classrooms,
various ceiling tiles, supply registers, and air handling
units, which showed heavy buildup on the insulated filters.
Parrish states Martin Middle School was also inspected, and
the report shows water damage associated with the suspended
ceiling, ceiling tiles, light fixtures, and HVAC supply
registers. Water stains were also evident on carpet in
several areas of the school, and visible mold growth was
identified in the various classrooms, ceiling tiles, and
supply registers in the school.
On February 4, 2009, plaintiffs filed the third amended
complaint alleging fraud in their complaint against the
Board of Education. In summary, the plaintiffs allege the
Board of Education denied that a mold problem existed at
Westview, when, in fact, the Board knew of the mold problem
as early as 1998, when memos, issued in 1998 and 1999,
discuss “heavy mold . . . evident on the gym concrete
bleacher areas” and “numerous ceiling tiles stained from
condensation.”
The Board of Education also sued H&M Construction, Fleming
Associates/Architects P.C. and Hughes Mechanical Contractor,
Inc. in April of 2000, alleging in paragraph 15 of the
complaint that “On or about March 13, 1998, plaintiffs, or
its employees or agents, noticed substantial moisture
problems and high humidity levels inside Westview High
School, which caused microbial growth, mildew and mold
throughout the school, thereby damaging the school
structure, plumbing and contents.”
(Read the rest of this story in the
February 18th print edition of the Dresden Enterprise.)